Generative search has redefined competition. Instead of battling for ten blue links, brands now compete for inclusion in AI-generated summaries and citations across LLMs. Traditional keyword rankings cannot capture this dynamic. The AI Search Competitor Tracking module solves this by translating AI visibility into measurable metrics, revealing how your brand performs relative to others across generative engines.
The dashboard displays aggregate performance trends for your brand and its competitors, showing fluctuations in AI Visibility % and Average Position over time. Below, a detailed competitor table ranks domains by their appearance frequency and relative strength within AI responses.
This data is not speculative. Every metric represents validated detections from Atomic’s AI Detection Pipeline - verified appearances of brand entities, URLs, or citations across generative outputs.
The module continuously queries tracked prompts across multiple AI engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and AI Overviews) to detect and log domain mentions. Each mention is parsed, timestamped, and weighted based on:
This produces two core indicators:
The pipeline reconciles raw detections with confidence scoring, removing false positives and normalizing data across engines. This results in consistent, verifiable visibility tracking, similar in rigor to SEO rank-tracking but adapted for generative search.
All data within the module comes from Atomic’s evidence-based detection system, supported by scheduled AI engine queries. Each detection is logged as an evidence instance when the model directly references or links a domain.
The pipeline runs continuous updates, performing:
Every visibility percentage is computed using the formula:
AI Visibility % = (Prompts with Verified Mentions ÷ Total Tracked Prompts) × 100
This ensures that results reflect actual evidence from AI outputs, not modeled estimations.
The main chart visualizes AI Visibility % over time for your brand and selected competitors. For example, Omnius (Your brand) shows 27.6% visibility with an average position of 6.93, outperforming Moz and Semrush in prompt detection.
Below the chart, the competitor list ranks each domain by visibility and position. Green deltas indicate rising mention frequency or improved average position, while red deltas denote declining visibility or model bias shifts.
Hovering over any metric reveals detection counts and visibility trends across the tracked engines, providing an immediate understanding of how generative models currently interpret each brand’s topical authority.
In 2025, more than 40% of all search interactions begin in generative interfaces, and inclusion in AI summaries now impacts perception as much as rankings once did. Without systematic visibility tracking, teams can’t measure share of voice in these new environments.
AI Search Competitor Tracking addresses this by quantifying where your brand stands in AI’s knowledge graph relative to peers. It provides early indicators of authority - long before those signals manifest as measurable clicks or conversions.
Monitoring AI Visibility % helps identify:
Teams use Competitor Tracking to:
For example, if Ahrefs maintains consistent presence across Perplexity but declines in Gemini, Atomic highlights this divergence, allowing analysts to study model behavior differences. Similarly, if your AI Visibility % rises following a schema update, it confirms improved machine interpretability.
This module integrates with Atomic’s Prompt Tracking, LLM Audit, and Reports tools:
Together, these connections transform competitor tracking into an operational intelligence system that links generative visibility to content and technical performance.
Competitor tracking is not simply about ranking comparison. It reveals model perception - how generative engines weigh topical authority. Teams can use this data to close gaps in entity coverage, detect where brand visibility is decaying, and prioritize updates to high-impact content areas.
By integrating competitive insights into Atomic’s analytics flow, teams gain a structured way to manage their brand’s footprint across both traditional and generative search ecosystems.
It represents the percentage of tracked prompts where a domain is mentioned or cited in AI-generated responses. The calculation uses verified detection counts from Atomic’s evidence pipeline.
Atomic currently supports ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Google AI Overviews, with automatic expansion as new engines become relevant.
Competitor data updates daily. Each refresh recalculates visibility and position based on the most recent detections across engines.
Average position indicates the weighted rank of a domain within AI responses, where 1.0 represents the first cited or most authoritative source.
Visibility may vary due to AI model retraining, prompt variability, or schema and content updates on competitor sites. Atomic flags large shifts and provides confidence labels for analysis.
Yes. You can filter competitors by tracked prompt clusters to analyze topic-specific authority (e.g., “SEO agencies” vs. “fintech content marketing”).
Each detection is validated through cross-engine verification and timestamp reconciliation. Visibility metrics are marked with confidence labels to distinguish evidence-based detections from lower-confidence mentions.
Integrate your data sources with Atomic in as little as 5 minutes.
Integrate with Atomic, and get up & running in 5 minutes.
Your data is visible only to you. Our system is completely encrypted.
